06MOSCOW13005, RUSSIA’S 2007 BUDGET: A QUICK OVERVIEW

WikiLeaks Link

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol).Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MOSCOW13005.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06MOSCOW13005 2006-12-20 15:59 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Moscow

VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMO #3005/01 3541559
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 201559Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5976
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
INFO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC

C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 013005 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EUR/RUS 
TREASURY BAKER/GAERTNER 
NSC FOR MCKIBBEN AND GRAHAM 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/19/2015 
TAGS: ECON EFIN PGOV RS
SUBJECT: RUSSIA'S 2007 BUDGET: A QUICK OVERVIEW 
 
REF: SEPARATE UNCLASS EMAIL ATTACHMENT 
 
Classified By: ECON M/C Pam Quanrud, Reasons 1.4 (b/d). 
 
Summary 
------- 
 
1.  (SBU) Despite considerable chatter to the contrary, 
Russia's 2007 Federal Budget (signed into law December 20 by 
President Putin) continues to reflect substantial fiscal 
restraint, with expenditures set to rise by just 1.5 percent 
of GDP and the primary surplus targeted at 5.3 percent of 
GDP.  The restraint is all the more noteworthy in light of 
the 2007-08 election cycle here and the pressing need to 
improve Russia's collapsing physical and social 
infrastructure.  Of note, and the source of some debate, has 
been the relatively high budget assumption for Urals crude -- 
at USD 61 a barrel, the Russian Government is at the top end 
of consensus forecasts (USD 55-61).  With this initial foray, 
Finance Minister Kudrin appears to be trying to soften the 
ground for the next budget, which he hopes to make "oil 
free," or independent of oil export revenue.  This year's 
budget balances at a per-barrel price of Urals of USD 37 -- 
making it fairly bullet-proof from a fiscal perspective. 
Further details and charts are being sent via separate 
unclass email attachment.  End Summary. 
 
SIPDIS 
 
Salient Macro Features 
---------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU) The budget for 2007 marks a departure from recent 
budgets in being relatively optimistic in many, but not all, 
its assumptions, with the per-barrel price of Urals crude oil 
set at USD 61, at the top of the consensus forecast range, 
and natural gas pegged at USD 294, up 60 percent on 2006. 
Both the CPI assumptions (from 6.5 to 8 percent) and the 
ruble-dollar exchange rate (at RUB 26.5 per dollar) reflect 
an anticipated easing of so-called "Dutch disease" pressures 
in 2007, based on relatively good performance on both 
indicators in H2 2006.  That said, most experts believe that 
current account surpluses, combined with increased government 
expenditures, will continue to exert inflationary pressure in 
2007, and that to contain the upward pressure, monetary 
authorities are likely to allow the ruble to appreciate.  At 
the G-20 meeting in Melbourne, Kudrin said that real 
effective ruble appreciation would not exceed 5 percent in 
2007 provided that the Urals price does not exceed USD 61 per 
barrel. To really keep inflation in check, prices in the 
mid-50's would be welcome.  Interestingly, the GDP forecast 
for 2007 contained in the budget calls for only a 6 percent 
increase, which is lower than consensus forecasts, but may 
only reflect the fact that the budget process began in July 
-- long before the H2 2006 pick-up in the economy. 
 
3.  (C) There has been widespread speculation regarding 
Finance Minister Aleksey Kudrin's acceptance of the 
relatively high USD 61 per-barrel assumption put forward by 
the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.   Some 
commentators, including Renaissance Capital Chief Economist 
Vladimir Pantyushin, suggest that Kudrin has his sights set 
on a non-oil budget for 2008 (Kudrin has warned against undue 
reliance on oil revenues to finance budget programs) and this 
year's overshoot assumption will help set the stage. 
Pantyushin notes that if actual revenues were to fall below 
budgeted revenues because of a lower than expected price for 
Urals, Kudrin would be able to argue the dangers in a budget 
dependent on oil export revenues.  Kudrin's chief of staff, 
Vadim Grishin, has confirmed this analysis with us in private. 
 
Revenue 
------- 
 
4.  (SBU) The 2007 budget provides for revenue of RUB 6.97 
trillion (USD 265 billion, or 22.3 percent of GDP), largely 
in line with 2006 actual revenue flows (in percent of GDP 
terms). The Ministry of Finance believes that "non-oil 
revenue" will grow by 1.2 percent of GDP in 2007 -- a 
positive trend, since in recent years this figure has been in 
decline.  To achieve growth in "non-oil" revenue, the GOR 
will need to enhance its collection and administration of 
taxes, which is clearly a double edged proposition in Russia. 
 
Expenditure 
----------- 
 
5.  (C) President Putin has called for higher spending in 
2007, and in the medium-term "at a pace adequate to the pace 
of economic growth."  Expenditures in 2007 are slated to 
remain constant in percent of GDP terms, with the 1.5 percent 
of GDP in spending falling solely on the non-interest 
expenditure side of the budget.  Transfers to regional and 
local governments still dominate the budget.  Cynics will say 
that this represents a serious slackening of fiscal 
federalism discipline, but economic reformers says they need 
this ability to reward and punish as part of the process of 
enforcing both budget discipline and new mandates on 
sub-federal actors -- a kind of necessary evil on the way to 
a more stable fiscal federal system in the long term. 
Defense, national security and law enforcement will see 
slight increases in percent of GDP terms compared with 2006, 
but while higher spending is on tap for healthcare and &#x
000A;education -- two of the four National Priority Projects -- no 
one walked away with any serious spending boost for 2007. 
Grishin says that the pressure to spend is greater than ever, 
but Kudrin managed to keep Economic Minister Gref's 
Investment Fund, which finances infrastructure and industry 
development projects on the basis of public-private 
partnerships (PPP), to a modest RUB 110 billion (USD 4.2 
billion) in 2007, and the new Venture Fund, aimed at spurring 
PPP investments in IT and the high-tech sector, to RUB 15 
billion (USD 570 million). 
 
Stabilization Fund 
------------------ 
 
6.  (SBU) The Stabilization Fund will continue to see 
contributions from the mineral extraction tax and export 
duties generated by the price of Urals crude over USD 27 per 
barrel as well as the overall budget's surplus.  By the end 
of 2007, it is expected to almost double to USD 165 billion. 
As if to vindicate Pantyushin's argument about the Finance 
Ministry's interest in the non-oil budget concept, Kudrin 
submitted a proposal to Prime Minister Fradkov on December 5 
that calls for all oil and gas revenues be collected into a 
new Oil and Gas Fund.  According to Kudrin's plan, the Oil 
and Gas Fund would consist of a "reserve" component and a 
"savings account."  It would also replace the Stabilization 
Fund.  The Oil and Gas Fund's reserve component would be used 
to finance budget deficits and, once it reaches 7-10 percent 
of GDP, would finance the savings account, which would pay 
for pensions and other social programs.  Kudrin's proposal 
specifies no timeline, and would need GOR approval before 
going into effect. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
7.  (SBU) The 2007 budget is not exactly internally 
consistent in its assumptions, but perhaps we can understand 
why.   (Most obviously, a high Urals price implies demand for 
rubles will be equally high, which would put pressure on the 
ruble-dollar exchange rate and inflation.)  If Kudrin's 
volley works, next year will not witness the revenue 
overshoots we are seeing this year, and at least the 
"perceived" shortfall in the budget may prove useful in 
making his bold argument for a future budgeting process 
independent of oil revenue. In the meantime, at a minimum, it 
may prove a useful brake on election-year spending 
temptations. 
RUSSELL

Wikileaks

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: