Daily Archives: December 20, 2007

07MOSCOW5899, RUSSIA-CHINA RELATIONS

WikiLeaks Link

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol).Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MOSCOW5899.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MOSCOW5899 2007-12-20 15:24 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Moscow

VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMO #5899/01 3541524
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 201524Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5963
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 005899 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/20/2017 
TAGS: PREL PGOV ECON ENRG CH RS
SUBJECT: RUSSIA-CHINA RELATIONS 
 
Classified By: Political M/C Alice Wells.  Reasons 1.4 (B/D). 
 
1.  (C) Summary.  The pragmatic pursuit of economic growth 
and political stability, and a determined effort to avoid 
"interfering" with each other's domestic political 
developments have brought an improvement in ties between 
Russia and China.  The conclusion of two "national years" 
created a stronger foundation for mutual understanding and 
precedes reciprocal years of the Russian and Chinese 
languages.  Economic cooperation, however, has not kept pace 
with the political declarations of "strategic partnership." 
Moscow experts predict that the bilateral trade relationship 
will grow for at least another decade, but that economic 
growth will be offset by Russian ambivalence about the role 
of China in its economic and political life.  Augmenting that 
ambivalence will be the continuing competition for political 
dominance and economic advantage in resource-rich Central 
Asia.  End summary. 
 
Successful National Years 
------------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU) At the conclusion of the 2006 Year of Russia in 
China and the 2007 Year of China in Russia, the two 
governments agreed to launch a follow-on Year of Russian 
language in China in 2009 and a Year of Chinese Language in 
Russia in 2010.  In a November interview, MFA Director of the 
First Asia Department Konstantin Vnukov expressed 
satisfaction that the national years had "expanded the social 
basis for bilateral relations."  Vnukov particularly lauded 
the many cultural events conducted during the Year of China. 
 
3.  (SBU) Vnukov stressed the regularity of high-level 
meetings in 2007 between the two countries:  President Hu's 
March visit to Moscow, Vice Premier Wu Yi's leading role in 
the 11th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin 
and Hu in Bishkek in August, FM Lavrov with the Chinese and 
Indian FMs in Harbin in October, and Premier Wen's visit to 
Moscow in November.  In addition, First Deputy Prime Minister 
Medvedev and Vice Premier Wu Yi, who jointly headed the 
Years, actively engaged with each other throughout the year. 
During the official opening of the Year of China in March, 
Putin and Hu signed 21 agreements worth over USD 4 billion, 
USD 500 million of which was to be Russian exports of Russian 
machinery and technical products. 
 
More to Come 
------------ 
 
4.  (SBU) The bilateral trade volume in 2007 has reached USD 
40 billion, making China Russia's second largest trade 
partner after the EU.  The GOR expects that the amount will 
increase to USD 60 billion by 2010.  Chinese investment in 
Russia centers on construction, including the multifunctional 
"Baltic Pearl" complex in St. Petersburg and celluoid-paper 
mills in the Chita and Khabarovsk regions. Vnukov expected 
that Chinese companies would be awarded contracts for 
infrastructure projects for the 2012 Vladivostok APEC Summit 
and the 2014 Sochi Olympics. 
 
Growing Ties 
------------ 
 
5.  (U) China is part of the fabric of life in Russia. 
Besides the ever-present Chinese consumer goods, China is 
frequently on Russia's cultural center stage.  The Institute 
of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences is 
publishing a multi-volume encyclopedia entitled "China: 
Spiritual Culture."  The first volume was published in 2006 
and several more are expected in 2007.  It is easier to catch 
movies in Moscow by well-known Chinese directors such as 
Zhang Yimu or Ang Lee than Japanese or Korean films.  With 
more exposure to Chinese culture has come a growing interest 
in the Chinese language.  One of President Putin's daughters 
is majoring in Chinese at a St. Petersburg university.  In 
2006, 2.35 million Russians visited China, among whom 1.3 
million were tourists, while 765,000 Chinese, 157,000 of them 
tourists, returned the favor. 
 
Despite Progress, Problems Abound 
--------------------------------- 
 
6.  (C) Most experts view the "blossoming" of Russia-China 
relations as something necessary and beneficial to Russia.  A 
group lead by the Director of the Institute of Far Eastern 
Studies Mikhail Titarenko is strenuously recommending the 
Chinese model:  economic development above all; while 
pro-Western scholars at the Moscow Carnegie Center argue that 
Russia should not follow the "predatory" modernization model 
of China.  All agree that Russia's China policy lacks 
direction and clearly thought-out objectives, and that its 
terms are generally set by the Chinese. 
 
--Russian Platitude, Chinese Focus: 
 
7.  (C) IMEMO's Gennadiy Chufrin summarized the bilateral 
relationship as one with a proper political climate but 
limited prospects for full development.  According to 
Chufrin, "The problem lies with the Russians, not the 
Chinese; the Chinese know exactly what they want but we don't 
know what our nation's interests are in dealing with them." 
Not having formulated clearly what the policy and goals 
sh
ould be, the GOR repeats stock phrases about strategic 
partnership and a peaceful neighborhood.  Among Russian 
official and analysts, there is a firm understanding that 
there will never be a formal alliance between the two.  The 
issue of Taiwan is a case in point. Russia supports the 
one-China policy and does not consider Tibet a serious 
problem for China but should there be open conflict, the GOR 
will never opt for direct involvement on the side of China. 
 
--Economic Discomfort: 
 
8.  (C) While the GOR has good reasons to be satisfied with 
the increasing bilateral trade volume, most experts pointed 
out that the structure of that trade is dictated by the 
Chinese, with Russia exporting raw materials, while Chinese 
manufactured goods saturate the Russian market.  Chufrin 
criticized the GOR for missing many economic opportunities, 
and noted the PRC's single-minded pursuit of its own 
advantage.  Chufrin argued that with a better conceived 
policy, the GOR could maximize its advantage in many fields 
including the construction industry; the energy sector, 
including nuclear energy; and financial flows and 
investments. 
 
9.  (C) Much of Russia's confused economic policies toward 
China is the by-product of its basic ambivalence about its 
rapidly growing neighbor.  MGIMO'S Aleksey Bogaturov thought 
the GOR's had created confusion with its much-publicized East 
Siberian Pacific Ocean Pipelines (ESPO).  With the change in 
Transneft's leadership (the state owned oil pipeline company 
in charge of the construction), the promised 2008 completion 
of the Taishet - Skvorodino leg (which connects to China's 
Daquing) was unlikely.  Moreover, the GOR is vacillating 
between China and Japan, while experts contend that there is 
not enough oil to supply both countries.  Chufrin alleged 
that GOR officials were not truthful about certain matters: 
despite the GOR's announcement that unprocessed timber was no 
longer exported to China, Chufrin himself had witnessed loads 
of raw timber, possibly illegal, ready for shipment to China 
from the Khabarovsk region. 
 
10.  (C) Although China is the largest buyer of Russia's 
weapons, the Russians are keenly aware that China will buy 
from the EU when/if the EU's embargo ends; leaving Russia 
only small-arms sales.  Chufrin predicted that China will 
follow the Indian model; combining Russian hardware with 
European technology as India has done with its aircraft 
industry. 
 
--Many Reasons to Worry: 
 
11.  (C) IMEMO's Nadezhda Arbatova maintained that China with 
its growing economic power and unclear military aspirations 
are throwing a long shadow over Russia and is making many 
Russians nervous.  Russia could not "copy" China, because the 
two societies are fundamentally different and a direct import 
of the Chinese model simply would not work in Russia.  Fedor 
Lukyanov, Chief Editor of Russia in Global Affairs, termed 
the Chinese "too smart" for the Russians to compete with. 
There is a sense among the Russians that they are being 
"outwitted" by the Chinese, he said.  As soon as Russia 
garnered a contract in early November to build more nuclear 
power stations -- a comfortable scenario as the new reactors 
would be similar to the two Russian-built models already 
operating in China, China awarded a large contract for four 
stations to France during Sarkozy's November visit.  Russia 
is experiencing role reversal -- from Soviet "big brother" to 
junior partner-- which is difficult to accept.  With a tinge 
of the prejudice that is often evident in conversations on 
China here, Lukyanov said that Russia would never play second 
fiddle in the region. 
 
-- How Much China Acceptable?: 
 
 12.  (C) Lukyanov said that Russia would be content with the 
status quo: mutual good feeling and continued Russian 
economic parity.  He knew that such a situation would not 
last long, however, and the GOR would soon have to define how 
much China it could accept, especially in Central Asia and 
the former Soviet space.  With Russia's sluggishness in 
Central Asia, Kazakhstan has been aggressively courted by 
China, said Bogaturov.  Friction within the Shanghai 
Cooperation Organization (SCO) is part of the GOR's 
"stupidity," and GOR officials will soon have to ask 
themselves if Russia would be willing to relinquish its 
dominant role in the organization to China.  Many experts 
urged that Russia, the EU, and the US identify areas where 
their interests intersect rather than trying to portray 
Russia - China relations as an attempt to counter the West. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
13.  (C) We expect little change in Russia-China relations in 
the near future; certainly not until well beyond the Russia's 
presidential elections. 
BURNS

Wikileaks

07MOSCOW5898, RUSSIA-MOLDOVA RELATIONS: BACK ON TRACK?

WikiLeaks Link

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol).Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MOSCOW5898.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MOSCOW5898 2007-12-20 15:00 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Moscow

VZCZCXYZ0020
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMO #5898 3541500
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 201500Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5962
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 005898 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/18/2017 
TAGS: PREL PGOV ECON MD RS
SUBJECT: RUSSIA-MOLDOVA RELATIONS: BACK ON TRACK? 
 
REF: MOSCOW 4828 
 
Classified By: Political M/C Alice G. Wells. 
Reasons 1.4 (B/D). 
 
1.  (C) Summary.  While evaluating Russia-Moldova relations 
without the Transnistria conflict is difficult, there are a 
few signs that the GOR is continuing its efforts to "mend" 
the bilateral relationship through economic and other means. 
The MFA told us that Russia is hopeful that frequent 
high-level meetings and regularized Intergovernmental 
Commission sessions could promote a better bilateral 
relationship.  On Transnistria, GOR official insisted that 
without the direct contact between Moldovan President Voronin 
and Transnistrian leader Smirnov, the conflict will remain 
frozen.  The MFA expressed concern over deteriorating 
Moldovan-Romanian relations.  End summary. 
 
Continued Progress in Bilateral Relations 
----------------------------------------- 
 
2.  (C) MFA Second CIS Department Director Viktor Sorokin 
during a December 18 meeting maintained that notwithstanding 
the situation in Transnistria, the GOR is trying to improve 
the bilateral relationship with Moldova on a pragmatic basis 
(reftel).  Putin and Voronin already met four times this year 
while another round of economic talks through the 
Intergovernmental Commission just concluded in Moscow. 
Although Sorokin told us that President Voronin is scheduled 
to visit Moscow in January, local press reported that Voronin 
will travel to Moscow December 21-22 to discuss customs 
regulations with a few other CIS leaders, including 
Nazarbayev and Lukashenko.  Some press reports also hinted 
that a Putin-Voronin meeting was scheduled in advance to 
discuss Kosovo implications on the Transnistria conflict. 
 
3,  (C) Sorokin positively characterized negotiations on 
Russia's ban on Moldovan wine, noting that besides the 17 
Moldovan wineries which have begun bringing Moldovan wines to 
Russia, many more companies are already undergoing "quality 
inspection" for import.  He said that the GOR hopes to expand 
bilateral trade beyond the current Russian  imports of wine, 
fruits, dairy products and meat, and exports of oil and gas. 
Sorokin pointed out that the humanitarian aid of grains and 
fuel during the 2007 summer drought in Moldova, which the GOR 
dispatched at the request of the Moldovan government, helped 
warm the relationship. 
 
Transnistria Still Frozen 
------------------------- 
 
4.  (C) Sorokin insisted that as long as there is no direct 
contact between Voronin and Smirnov, aimed at resolving the 
conflict, Transnistria will remain frozen.  All other 
"players" could only "help" but not "resolve," he added. 
Sorokin said that the GOR is frustrated with the attitude of 
both parties who "wait for others to solve the problem for 
them."  He regretted that the Kozak document did not go 
forward and stressed that since then, no positive movement 
has happened.  Separately, Deputy Director of the CIS 
Institute Vladimir Zarikhin, who advises the Duma 
International Relations Committee, claimed that Transnistria 
is "artificially" frozen.  Unlike other regional conflicts, 
Transnistria has no component of ethnic, religious difference 
and IDPs, while privatization happened after the break-up, 
lending itself more easily to the resolution.  Zarikhin 
warned that the GOR will apply Kosovo as a "model" for 
Transnistria. 
 
Moldova-Romania Relations 
------------------------- 
 
5.  (C) Sorokin expressed concern with the deteriorating 
relationship between Moldova and Romania.  He criticized the 
Romanian government for treating Moldova like a younger 
brother -- an "unhelpful" gesture.  Sorokin said that the 
relationship is "not simple" and needs to be tended 
carefully. 
BURNS

Wikileaks

07MOSCOW5884, THE RUSSIAN NGO LAW ONE YEAR LATER

WikiLeaks Link

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol).Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MOSCOW5884.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MOSCOW5884 2007-12-20 09:31 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Moscow

VZCZCXRO6493
PP RUEHLN RUEHPOD RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHMO #5884/01 3540931
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 200931Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5945
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 MOSCOW 005884 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM SOCI RS
SUBJECT: THE RUSSIAN NGO LAW ONE YEAR LATER 
 
REF: MOSCOW 05745 
 
Summary 
------- 
 
1.  (SBU) More than year after the implementation of 
controversial amendments with tougher reporting requirements 
for Russian non-governmental organizations, the fears of 
extensive, politically-motivated NGO closures have not 
materialized.  A USAID-funded study, civil society 
assessments and Embassy observations indicate: only 32 
percent of Russian NGOs are in compliance, with foreign 
financed human rights organizations more capable than most of 
fulfilling the GOR requirements.  Small, often 
service-oriented NGOs are disproportionately affected, with 
some choosing to operate as non-legal entities instead. 
While noncompliance leaves most NGOs vulnerable to 
prosecution, there is no evidence of a GOR campaign to use 
the amendments to shutter NGOs.  However, there are instances 
of localized conflicts with the Federal Registration Service 
and a few cases that appear politically motivated. 
Complicating assessments of the amendments has been the 
absence of reliable statistics on the number of active NGOs. 
The endemic institutional weakness of Russian NGOs have 
magnified the effects of the amendments.  We will continue to 
urge GOR modifications to the amendments that will help bring 
NGOs into legal compliance, in a manner that does not impinge 
upon their ability to operate transparently and effectively. 
End Summary. 
 
ICNL Assessment of NGO Law 
-------------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU) The results of a December 2007 USAID-supported 
study by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law 
(ICNL), assessing the cumulative impact of the new April 2006 
reporting requirements for Russian NGOs, broadly tracks with 
the impressions of the Embassy and other long standing 
observers of Russian civil society.  (Note:  This cable does 
not assess the registration law's effect on international 
NGOs, with all of those American NGOs in contact with the 
Embassy having secured registration by the end of October 
2006.)  The report's key findings include: 
 
-- Only 32 percent of Russian NGOs are in compliance with the 
reporting requirements.  ICNL notes that the high level of 
noncompliance suggests a large number of inactive NGOs. 
 
--  Human rights organizations - particularly Western 
financed NGOs - are more likely and more capable of meeting 
the higher reporting standard. 
 
--  The burden of the new reporting requirements falls 
disproportionately on small NGOs, which suffer from a 
shortage of staff, institutional capacity, and even 
rudimentary understanding of the legislative requirements. 
 
--  While noncompliance leaves NGOs vulnerable to 
prosecution, there is no evidence that the Federal 
Registration Service (FRS) has systematically fined or taken 
actions to close organizations that have failed to file 
reports on time or accurately. 
 
--  There is no evidence of the law being disproportionately 
applied to the detriment of human rights groups; however, the 
nature of the reporting requirements and the law's ambiguity 
with respect to certain provisions allow government officials 
"excessive discretion" in interpreting and enforcing the new 
measures. 
 
 
Who Suffers: Small NGOs Without Foreign Financing 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
3.  (SBU) Observers broadly agree with the ICNL conclusion 
that the law disproportionately burdens small NGOs, which 
lack the staff and resources to file accurate reports.  By 
law the NGO must file an annual report detailing its 
activities for the next year.  Foreign NGOs must also 
complete quarterly financial reports indicating their funding 
sources.  In a September assessment, the Center for the 
Development of Democracy and Human Rights (CDDHR) noted that 
NGO registration documents comprise at least 60 pages. Even 
minor changes in the organization's CEO or address require 
submission of notarized documents within three days of the 
change.  A delay could result in a substantial fine, and two 
fines could result in de-registration.  However, no 
organization to date has been fined or de-registered for 
failure to comply.  The FRS has new authority to audit NGOs 
for compliance with the new law.  The CDDHR report indicates 
that from January to April, FRS audits had discovered 
 
MOSCOW 00005884  002 OF 004 
 
 
violations by 6,000 NGOs although most of the violations 
minor in nature (e.g., missing protocols or improper 
paperwork). 
 
4.  (SBU) According to both Moscow Helsinki Group (MHG) 
Director Lyudmila Alekseeva and World Wildlife Fund Director 
Igor Chestin, the "innocent bystanders" in the registration 
process are the small, often service-oriented organizations, 
which were never the target of GOR suspicions of "orange 
revolutions."  In contrast, Alekseeva told us that all major 
human rights and environmental organizations had survived 
unscathed, with MHG itself "untouched" by the new process. 
For those without the technical assistance at hand, however, 
compliance has been difficult and exacerbated by a lack of 
resou
rces to obtain the expertise.  The seven-person 
environmental NGO Baikal Ecological Wave told us that it 
needed to hire two individuals to deal with reporting 
requirements and to ensure compliance with tax and labor 
laws. 
 
5.  (SBU) Some NGOs have reportedly decided to forego formal 
registration and operate instead as non-legal entities or 
"movements."  While these groups are restricted in what they 
can do, and are prevented from opening bank accounts or 
renting space as an organization, they can still legally 
operate.  MHG confirmed this trend, with Alekseeva giving two 
examples -- "Mothers of Children in Wheelchairs" and "Union 
of Deceived Investors" -- who jettisoned the registration 
process and MHG office space for their meetings.  Alekseeva 
noted the irony that registering as an NGO increased an 
organization's vulnerability, whereas operating as a 
non-legal entity (with the attendant restrictions) left 
activists better protected. 
 
The Fall-Out Is Small 
--------------------- 
 
6.  (SBU) While the 2006 amendments could be deployed to shut 
down NGOs, our contacts have not noticed a systematic effort 
by authorities to do so.  INCL's Daria Miloslavskaya 
recounted scattered instances of NGOs experiencing problems, 
but was not able to link them to the new requirements, nor 
could she pinpoint a specific reason why a particular NGO 
experienced problems with the FRS.  The CDDHR report also 
indicated some cases of NGOs running afoul of the local FRS 
offices, but could identify no FRS pattern of behavior.  This 
conclusion tracks with Embassy's assessment: in our travels 
around the country and frequent contacts with the NGO 
community, we have not discovered any systematic effort to 
use the amendments to shutter NGOs. 
 
7.  (SBU) We are aware of a few active organizations that 
were sanctioned under the NGO law.  A notable case occurred 
on October 24 when the FRS suspended the operations of the 
Samara chapter of the USAID-funded election monitoring NGO 
Golos for six months for violating financial reporting 
requirements.  Golos maintained that the charges were 
politically motivated, and that regional authorities had 
sought to close down Golos because of its perceived 
connection to opposition groups.  Golos claimed that it was 
not given sufficient time or afforded due process to answer 
the allegations.  Nationwide, however, Golos succeeded in 
fielding 3,000 observers during the December 2 Duma 
elections, with only a handful of its staff facing official 
restrictions (reftel).  In the case of the Educated Media 
Foundation (Internews), the GOR used federal crime and tax 
laws to freeze the NGO's accounts and seize its computers. 
With respect to the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society, the 
GOR secured an extremism conviction against its Director, 
which served as the basis for the registration denial. 
 
8.  (U) The CDDHR report notes other prominent cases of NGOs 
experiencing bureaucratic problems with the FRS.  For 
example, the human rights flagship "Memorial" could not 
register a change in its CEO because the FRS first demanded 
evidence that it was a "national" organization.  The report 
documented instances of FRS warnings or refusals to register 
changes sometimes for minor violations or infractions.  In 
Voronezh, the Center for Public Awareness, Arts and Cinema 
"Youth" was denied a change of CEO due to typographical 
errors in the documents.  In Ryazan the local FRS suspended a 
local human rights group for one month because it allegedly 
held meetings in a private apartment.  The St. Petersburg NGO 
Bellona was cited for undertaking commercial activity, since 
the FRS considered the publication of donors' names in 
Bellona's reports as "advertising" for sponsors.  In 
Bashkortostan, the FRS suspended the activities of one NGO 
because the CEO was ill and could not be present on the day 
of an FRS audit.  The FRS in Tyumen twice refused to register 
Rainbow House, a gay youth organization, as an NGO since its 
activities "undermined the security of the Russian 
 
MOSCOW 00005884  003 OF 004 
 
 
Federation."  The CDDHR report noted that these and other 
examples indicate that the FRS may have overstepped its 
authority or misinterpreted the law, but did not identify any 
systematic targeting of human rights NGOs. 
 
NGO Noncompliance Raises Vulnerabilities 
---------------------------------------- 
 
9.  (SBU) The amended NGO law has increased substantially the 
vulnerability of most NGOs to official scrutiny, since the 
vast majority of organizations are not in full compliance. 
According to the FRS, while NGOs were required by law to 
submit financial reports by April 15, only 20 percent did so. 
 By the first of July, the compliance rate increased to 28 
percent, and by October 31 to 32 percent. 
 
10.  (SBU) Although FRS Chief Vasilyev attributed this low 
compliance rate to the willful decision of NGOs to ignore the 
law, contacts in the NGO community more often note ignorance 
of the law itself or the difficulty of full compliance. 
ICNL's Miloslavskaya reported that at most 30 percent of NGOs 
fully understand the scope of the amended NGO law. 
Typically, an NGO will learn of a particular requirement only 
after the FRS has conducted an audit and noted a deficiency. 
At that point, the organization will have earned an 
administrative warning.  After two such warnings the 
organization can be shuttered. 
 
Number of Active NGOs Difficult to Assess 
----------------------------------------- 
 
11.  (SBU) An analysis of the effects of the new reporting 
requirements is made more difficult by the absence of any 
reliable data on the number of active NGOs in Russia.  Prior 
to implementation of the 2006 amendments, non-profit or 
non-commercial organizations registered with the tax 
authority, whereas social movements or social organizations 
registered with the Ministry of Justice.  Neither government 
agency routinely released statistics on the numbers of 
registrants.  The Federal Registration Service currently has 
responsibility for registering both types of organizations; 
however, even this organization may not know the true number 
of NGOs.  Miloslavskaya told us that in some regions the tax 
authority still has not transferred some NGO registration 
records to the local FRS. 
 
12.  (SBU) As a result, wildly disparate estimates circulate 
on the scope of Russian civil society.  FRS Chief Sergey 
Vasilyev, in an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta, estimated 
there were 216,000 registered.  In a May 2006 statement, the 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs cited 400,000 NGOs, whereas 
Moscow Helsinki Group (MHG) Chairperson Lyudmila Alekseeva 
alleged 650,000 in 2005, with Miloslavskaya unwilling even to 
provide a rough estimate of the number of NGO's operating in 
Russia during that time period.  We could not locate 
corroborating information for either the MFA or MHG
 estimate. 
 Miloslavskaya maintained that the number of NGOs today does 
not differ much from before the amendments, since most 
Russian NGOs went along with the new rules and its reporting 
requirements as they were not subject to re-registration. 
ICNL had not detected any large number of NGOs declining 
registration under the new rules or changing status to 
unregistered social movements.  While the ICNL report notes 
that the FRS applied for the closure of approximately 2,600 
NGOs for failure to adhere to legislation pre-dating the 
April 2006 amendments (compared to 8,761 new registrations), 
neither ICNL nor other civil society watch groups have found 
evidence that these were active organizations. 
 
NGO Structural Weaknesses Continue 
---------------------------------- 
 
13.  (SBU) Ford Foundation Director Steven Solnick told us 
that the endemic weakness of civil society in Russia has 
magnified the effect of the new amendments and reporting 
requirements on the NGO community.  NGOs in Russia have grown 
too dependent on Western financing, he said, and have 
remained too isolated from popular opinion.  Wrapping up five 
years as Ford Foundation head, Solnick concluded that NGOs 
were less resourceful now in diversifying funding.  They 
eschewed volunteers, and remained anachronistically hostile 
to media campaigns and other modern tools for building ties 
with the public.  The GOR had succeeded in "crushing" 
community activism, according to Solnick, and flagship human 
rights organizations were blinded by an elitism that flowed 
from a Soviet intelligentsia-like bias against the "masses." 
"If Putin closed Moscow Helsinki Group tomorrow," Solnick 
asked, "would any one come out on the streets in protest?" 
 
14.  (SBU) Alekseeva agreed with the thrust of Solnick's 
critique, but attributed civil society weakness to the 
 
MOSCOW 00005884  004 OF 004 
 
 
immaturity of democracy in Russia and the fact that 
revolutions have always been handed down from above and not 
won by the people.  Alekseeva expressed satisfaction that the 
increasingly authoritarian nature of the Putin government 
would mean the "fight for democracy begins now."  What had 
been accomplished by civil society, she emphasized, was the 
promulgation of knowledge and the inculcation of an 
expectation of human rights (which were only "so-called" in 
Soviet times).  As long as times were good and coffers full, 
Alekseeva downplayed real movement forward.  However, 
Alekseeva argued that grievances were accumulating and when 
they came to a boil it would be civil society's 
responsibility to ensure that a new generation of human 
rights activists was prepared to capitalize on public anger. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
15.  (SBU) When the amendments were passed, the NGO community 
rightly feared that the requirements would be used to target 
watchdog groups and perceived opponents of the Putin regime. 
That has not happened and, ironically, the Western-financed 
human rights organizations have been among the most capable 
of meeting the new administrative burdens.  However, the 
vulnerability of the NGO community to fines and selective 
prosecution is real.  We will continue (along with EU 
countries and in support of Russian voices) to urge GOR 
reform of the NGO amendments that will ease the reporting 
requirements (or exempt certain categories all together), 
clarify the implementing legislation, define the scope of 
audits, and restrict the FRS's ability to close NGOs. 
BURNS

Wikileaks

07MOSCOW5879, MFA DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR ON IRAN, AFGHANISTAN,

WikiLeaks Link

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol).Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MOSCOW5879.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MOSCOW5879 2007-12-20 07:31 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Moscow

VZCZCXRO6364
OO RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHDIR RUEHKUK RUEHPW
DE RUEHMO #5879/01 3540731
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 200731Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5934
INFO RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNAFG/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 MOSCOW 005879 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/17/2017 
TAGS: PREL IR AF RS
SUBJECT: MFA DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR ON IRAN, AFGHANISTAN, 
PAKISTAN 
 
Classified By: Classified by Ambassador William J. Burns for reasons 1. 
4 (b,d). 
 
1.  (C) Summary: In a December 18 meeting, MFA Second Asia 
Department Director Maryasov reviewed the results of Iranian 
FM Mottaki's December 13-14 trip to Moscow, noting bilateral 
agreements on trade and cooperation, confirming the sale of 
130 civilian aircraft was possible but premature, and 
reiterating that Russia was not interested in creating a gas 
cartel with Iran.  Maryasov said FM Lavrov's meeting with 
Mottaki broke no new ground on Iran's nuclear program, and 
Lavrov told the Ambassador in a December 19 meeting that he 
pushed for Iran to suspend uranium enrichment and claim a 
"victory" with its securing of Bushehr's fuel (septel). 
Mottaki also discussed Iran's position on key regional 
issues, including Afghanistan, Iraq, MEPP, and Lebanon. 
Maryasov agreed to look into the case of Robert Levinson, an 
Amcit that is missing in Iran.  On other issues, Maryasov 
outlined Russia's plans to increase its bilateral and 
multilateral assistance to Afghanistan, including by working 
with NATO, and expressed Russia's concern with the growing 
influence of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  End 
summary. 
 
FM Mottaki's Visit Yields Bilateral Dividends 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
2.  (C) In a December 18 meeting, MFA Second Asia Department 
Director Aleksandr Maryasov characterized as productive 
Iranian FM Mottaki's December 13-14 visit for a meeting of 
the bilateral commission on trade and cooperation.  He said 
that Mottaki and Rosatom Director Kiriyenko, who heads the 
commission on the GOR side, signed a long-term memorandum of 
understanding on trade and cooperation and an agreement on 
tourism.  In the next few months, another agreement would be 
signed on the mutual protection of economic investments. 
 
3.  (C) Maryasov added that the bilateral commission would 
also facilitate joint business projects in the fields of 
energy and transportation, including railway and aviation. 
He noted that a number of business contracts would likely be 
signed at the next commission meeting in 2008 in Tehran. 
Maryasov commented that "it is only natural" that Iran has 
shown increased interest in expanding economic ties with 
Russia, as Iran "has largely been cut off from European -- 
not to mention the U.S. -- markets."  He stressed that the 
GOR did not intend to direct business deals to Iran (as 
Mottaki had sought) but the trade should be based on mutual 
interest and driven by market forces. 
 
4.  (C)  When asked about press reports that Iran may 
purchase 130 civilian aircraft from Russia, Maryasov said the 
sale is still under review, although he noted that Russian 
companies are interested in completing such a deal.  (Note: 
Mottaki visited the Tupolev plant in Kazan during his visit.) 
 We noted that the U.S. would follow closely the possible 
transaction, given sanctions implications.  Maryasov 
underscored that the type of aircraft under discussion was 
strictly used for civilian purposes and reiterated that 
transactions would be in line with UN resolutions and 
international regimes. 
 
5.  (C) On Iranian press reports about the possible creation 
of a gas cartel similar to OPEC, Maryasov confirmed Iran's 
proposal but stressed that the Iranians were told flatly that 
Russia was not interested.  Such a cartel would "dictate 
demands" to consumer countries, and Russia is in favor of 
"balanced relations" with gas suppliers and consumers. 
 
Mottaki Regurgitates Official Position on Nuclear Program 
--------------------------------------------- ------------ 
 
6.  (C) Maryasov told us that Mottaki's separate meeting with 
FM Lavrov focused on Iran's nuclear program.  Lavrov 
commended Iran for its continued cooperation with the IAEA 
and its intention to resolve the remaining three (out of six) 
issues raised in the IAEA plan, but emphasized the need to 
address outstanding UNSC concerns about uranium enrichment 
and other activities.  In a December 19 lunch with the 
Ambassador, Lavrov confirmed that he encouraged Mottaki to 
take advantage of the "recent favorable conditions" -- 
particularly the GOR's December 16 initial delivery of 
nuclear fuel to the Bushehr plant -- to suspend its uranium 
enrichment and claim "victory" by having secured nuclear fuel 
and developed nuclear technology. 
 
7.  (C) Maryasov stressed that the GOR has been consistent in 
its message to Iranian leaders -- from Putin's and Lavrov's 
October trips to Tehran to Iranian nuclear negotiator 
Jalili's December visit to Moscow -- that Iran could preserve 
rhetorically its sovereign right to continue uranium 
 
MOSCOW 00005879  002 OF 003 
 
 
enrichment, but needed to suspend enrichment immediately in 
order to address the outstanding concerns of the 
international community.  However, Maryasov said that Mottaki 
gave Lavrov the "usual reply" that Iran should not be 
deprived of its right to develop nuclear energ
y and only 
agreed (again) to take Russia's suggestion under advisement. 
 
Mottaki on International Issues 
------------------------------- 
 
8.  (C) Mottaki also discussed with Lavrov a number of other 
regional issues. 
 
-- Afghanistan: Mottaki said Iran was worried about President 
Karzai's conciliatory gestures toward some members of the 
Taliban, stressing that such a policy was "dangerous." 
Instead, Karzai should be ratcheting up the fight against 
Taliban forces.  Mottaki urged Lavrov not to believe "those 
who are saying" Iran is conducting negotiations with the 
Taliban; "the Taliban is our enemy." 
 
-- Iraq: Mottaki observed that terrorist activity had 
declined in Iraq and noted a "good level" of cooperation 
between Iran and the U.S. on Iraq, expressing readiness to 
continue its dialogue with the U.S.  Mottaki added that Iran 
was committed to supporting the Maliki government in its 
efforts to achieve national reconciliation and political 
stability. 
 
-- MEPP: Mottaki reiterated Iran's position that the 
Annapolis conference was not in the interest of Arab 
countries.  Maryasov said Lavrov rejected this position, 
arguing that Annapolis represented one more step to the 
resolution of the existing problems in the region and 
highlighted Syria's participation in the conference as an 
illustration of the importance of the conference.  Mottaki 
responded that Iran was very disappointed that Syria took 
part in the conference.  Maryasov said Mottaki took on board 
Lavrov's request that Iran help moderate Hamas' "aggressive 
behavior." 
 
-- Lebanon: Lavrov told Mottaki it "would be wise" if Iran 
encouraged all political forces in Lebanon, including 
Hezbollah, to reach a political consensus and agree on a 
compromise candidate for the position of president.  Mottaki 
said Iran was already working in this direction, but stressed 
that the situation is very difficult. 
 
Levinson Case 
------------- 
 
9.  (C) We reiterated our request for GOR assistance in 
obtaining the whereabouts of missing American citizen Robert 
Levinson, noting that thus far Iran has shown no interest in 
cooperating with the Swiss and the Levinson family.  Maryasov 
undertook to look into the matter. 
 
Russian Assistance to Afghanistan 
--------------------------------- 
 
10.  (C) Maryasov agreed that, despite tensions in other 
areas, Afghanistan represented one issue where there was 
strong potential for deeper Russian cooperation with the U.S. 
and NATO.  Maryasov reviewed the possible channels through 
which Russia could funnel its increased assistance to 
Afghanistan. 
 
-- Bilateral assistance: Russia is ready to provide increased 
military assistance to the Afghan National Army (ANA), but 
the details of this assistance would be discussed when the 
Afghan Defense Minister visits Moscow for talks.  Maryasov 
noted that Afghanistan has yet to respond to Russia's 
invitation with a proposed date.  Without going into details, 
Maryasov added that Russia was considering a resumption of 
its assistance that was suspended in 2006 (apparently because 
the Karzai government was not fully utilizing the 
assistance).  Maryasov confirmed that Russian narcotics 
liaison officers are already working in Afghanistan and are 
providing Afghan drug officers training on counternarcotics 
work.  He also confirmed that Russia is discussing with 
Afghanistan several investment projects, including the 
building of a thermal station and the reconstruction of the 
Solong tunnel. 
 
-- NATO: Russia is interested in coordinating with NATO on 
the delivery of military equipment and goods through Russian 
and Central Asian territory to ISAF, noting that only some 
technical and legal issues had to be resolved.  Maryasov 
added that Russia would also be willing to work with NATO to 
provide the ANA with high-quality Russian weaponry. 
 
 
MOSCOW 00005879  003 OF 003 
 
 
-- CSTO: When asked about the possibility of Russia and NATO 
working together on counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan, 
Maryasov said the Collective Security Treaty Organization 
(CSTO) was the preferred mechanism for Russia.  He noted the 
involvement of Pakistan and Afghanistan in the CSTO's 
Operation Channel drug interdiction and eradication efforts 
last year. 
 
-- SCO: Maryasov confirmed that Russia was also interested in 
increasing the activity of the Shanghai Cooperation 
Organization (SCO) in Afghanistan.  Specifically, SCO was 
exploring the possibility of providing assistance in 
counter-terrorism, counternarcotics, and economic 
development.  Maryasov told us that SCO would hold an 
international conference on Afghanistan, and participants 
would include SCO members and observers (including India and 
Iran), with major donors (including the U.S.) and other 
international organizations also invited.  Maryasov said the 
SCO was still working on a date and location for the 
conference. 
 
11.  (C) Noting that almost all of the CSTO members are also 
members of SCO, we sought clarification on the delineation of 
responsibilities between CSTO and SCO.  Maryasov explained 
that SCO, which was created to help resolve border disputes 
among member states, was mainly devoted to political and 
economic development.  CSTO, on the other hand, is 
essentially a political-military organization. 
 
MFA on Domestic Politics in Afghanistan 
--------------------------------------- 
 
12.  (C) Maryasov noted that Afghan political leaders are 
increasingly more focused on the upcoming national elections 
and commented that the relationship between Karzai and the 
United Front has become more complicated.  Maryasov argued 
that the United Front was formed as a "constructive 
opposition," providing Karzai with reasonable proposals on 
creating more efficient state institutions and bringing 
different nationalities into the government to create a more 
balanced political system.  The United Front leaders tell 
Russia that Karzai ignored these proposals.  Maryasov said 
Russia has encouraged Karzai to reconsider some of the United 
Front suggestions, as the United Front leaders are only 
trying to strengthen (and not weaken) Karzai's governing 
capacity.  Maryasov took aim at Karzai, noting that Russia 
has the impression that Karzai would rather work with 
moderate Taliban than with the United Front. 
 
13.  (C) Maryasov maintained that international efforts 
should be focused not only on increasing the capacity of the 
ANA, but on providing significantly more financial and 
logistical assistance to local governments.  He attributed 
the Taliban's strong and growing presence in the provinces to 
weak local institutions (which receive virtually no support 
from the central government) and a dramatic change in Taliban 
strategy to win over local inhabitants and tribal leaders. 
The Taliban have adopted a more "mild and friendly" approach, 
and Maryasov told us tha
t the Taliban has detailed this 
approach in a written code of conduct for Taliban members. 
The Taliban have also proven adept at promoting their 
"successes" in establishing order and stability in 
Taliban-controlled cities. 
 
Pakistan 
-------- 
 
13.  (C) Maryasov noted Musharraf's recent positive steps to 
restore political stability to Pakistan, and said Russia was 
pleased that both opposition parties led by Nawaz Sharif and 
Benazir Bhutto would take part in the upcoming elections. 
Maryasov underscored that a "dangerous situation" was 
nonetheless developing in the country, pointing to the 
official establishment of a Taliban movement last week, with 
its stated goal of removing all foreign military forces from 
the country.   Maryasov said that the Taliban is 
consolidating its forces "on both sides of the border 
(between Afghanistan and Pakistan)."  Given the complicated 
domestic situation in Pakistan, Maryasov concluded that 
Musharraf had done reasonably well and warned against 
discounting the Pakistani President's contribution to 
fighting terrorists. 
 
BURNS

Wikileaks

07MOSCOW5878, THE RUSSIAN NGO LAW ONE YEAR LATER

WikiLeaks Link

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol).Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MOSCOW5878.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MOSCOW5878 2007-12-20 07:24 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Moscow

VZCZCXRO6433
PP RUEHLN RUEHPOD RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHMO #5878/01 3540724
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 200724Z DEC 07 ZFR
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5930
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 MOSCOW 005878 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM SOCI RS
SUBJECT: THE RUSSIAN NGO LAW ONE YEAR LATER 
 
MOSCOW 00005878  001.2 OF 004 
 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN CANCELLED 
 
PLEASE RECALL ALL COPIES 
 
MESSAGE WILL BE RESENT WITH NEW MRN/MCNS AND 
CORRECT CLASSIFICATION 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
 
MOSCOW 00005878  002.2 OF 004 
 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN CANCELLED 
 
PLEASE RECALL ALL COPIES 
 
MESSAGE WILL BE RESENT WITH NEW MRN/MCNS AND 
CORRECT CLASSIFICATION 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
 
MOSCOW 00005878  003.2 OF 004 
 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN CANCELLED 
 
PLEASE RECALL ALL COPIES 
 
MESSAGE WILL BE RESENT WITH NEW MRN/MCNS AND 
CORRECT CLASSIFICATION 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
 
 
MOSCOW 00005878  004.2 OF 004 
 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN CANCELLED 
 
PLEASE RECALL ALL COPIES 
 
MESSAGE WILL BE RESENT WITH NEW MRN/MCNS AND 
CORRECT CLASSIFICATION 
 
ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR /// ZFR 
 
BURNS

Wikileaks